Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2014 DAILYLAW 2648 (BOM)

SHANKAR KACHRU KEDARE v. PUNJABAI SHANKAR KEDARE AND ANOTHER

FCA/3/2014 · 2026-01-28

Shri Hiten S Venegavkar, Smt Vibha Kankanwadi

body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

908-FCA-3-14.odt {1} IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 908 FAMILY COURT APPEAL NO. 3 OF 2014 Shankar Kachru Kedare VERSUS Punjabai Shankar Kedare And Another ...... CORAM : SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI AND HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR, JJ. DATE : 28 JANUARY, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. We have seen the order dated 20.01.2026. Learned advocate for the appellant is absent. It appears from the record that the appellant has not provided fresh address of the respondent No.2 though accommodations were granted. 2. Now, as the learned advocate appearing for the appellant is also absent, it appears that the appellant has lost interest in the matter. Under such circumstances, the appeal stands dismissed in default. [ HITEN S. VENEGAVKAR ] [ SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI ] JUDGE JUDGE S P Rane