ASARAM KUDAJI FALKE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS
WP/362/2014 · 2026-08-06
Shri Sachin S Deshmukh
body2014
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 2620 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 2620 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
9 WP362.2014+ -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 9 WRIT PETITION NO. 362 OF 2014 ASARAM KUDAJI FALKE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Nilkanth P. Bangar AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. B. V. Virdhe Advocate for Respondents No.3&4 : Mr. Anant Dale h/f. Mr. Vakil Laharimanohar D. … WITH … WRIT PETITION NO. 361 OF 2014 BRAMHDEO ASARAM KALE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Nilkanth P. Bangar AGP for Respondent/State: Mr. B. V. Virdhe Advocate for Respondents No.3&4 : Mr. Anant Dale h/f. Mr. Vakil Laharimanohar D. …
CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. Date : 06.08.2026 PER COURT :-
1. In view of availability of alternate remedy, learned counsel for the Petitioners, on instructions, seeks liberty to withdraw these Petitions to prosecute the remedy which is available in law. 2026:BHC-AUG:34193
9 WP362.2014+ -2-
2. With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petitions are
disposed of with further direction that the time spent in prosecuting the present Petitions shall be considered by the concerned authority. The interim order dated 13.01.2014, since it was in force from said date, shall continue for the period of four (04) weeks from today.
(SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.) marathe