Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2014 DAILYLAW 2616 (BOM)

SANTOSH DAGDU MHASE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS

WP/11057/2014 · 2026-07-10

Shri Sachin S Deshmukh

body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE JUDICATURE OF HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 901 WRIT PETITION NO. 11057 OF 2014 Santosh Dagdu Mhase VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Ms. Avantika S. Kharade h/f Mr. Karpe Rahul R. AGP for Respondents-State: Mr. V. M. Jaware ... CORAM : SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J. Dated : July 10, 2026 PER COURT :- 1. When confronted with the availability of the alternative remedy, the learned Counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the Writ Petition so as to approach the Appellate Authority. He further requests that the interim order granted by this Court be continued for a period of four weeks from today. 2. The concerned authority shall take into consideration the fact that the petitioner was bona fide prosecuting the present petition before this Court while considering the application for condonation of delay. 3. With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. 4. The interim order granted by this Court shall continue for a period of four weeks from today. (SACHIN S. DESHMUKH, J.) vj gawade/-. Page 1 of 1 2026:BHC-AUG:27738