Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2014 DAILYLAW 2191 (RAJ)

SUNIL KUMAR GARG v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN THROUGH PP

CRLMP/5531/2014 · 2026-03-18

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 5531/2014 Sunil Kumar Garg S/o Shri Ghanshyam Garg, R/o D-198, Kanti Chandra Road, Banipark, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Complainant-Petitioner Versus The State of Rajasthan through the Public prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr.Mahesh Gupta For Respondent(s) : Mr.Vivek Choudhary, PP Mr.Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 18/03/2026 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner-complainant submits that the instant petition has been submitted before this Court seeking issuance of direction to the Court below for sending the disputed documents/signatures to Forensic Science Laboratory for examination. 2. Counsel further submits that during pendency of the instant petition, the disputed signatures have been examined by the FSL and thereafter, on the basis of the report of FSL as well as the protest petition submitted by the petitioner, cognizance has already been taken against the accused persons, hence, under the changed circumstances, this petition has become infructuous. 3. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, the instant criminal misc. petition is rendered as infructuous. The (2 of 2) [CRLMP-5531/2014] instant criminal misc. petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. All pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Aayush Sharma /19