CWP-28209 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 118 Hemraj and another State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Present: - NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) 1. Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner writ in the nature of service of petitioner 20.08.2014 more than 10 years of se arrears as petitioner Department since the year 200 covered with the recent judgment (Annexure P writ petitions having leading case Singh and others 2. petitioners, namely, Hemraj and Jagdish Labourer(s) on daily wages vide (Annexures P 28209-2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP Date of Decision: Hemraj and another Versus State of Haryana and others CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. SK Daaria, Advocate for the petitioners. NIDHI GUPTA, J. (ORAL) Present writ petition under Article Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioner writ in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to regularize the service of petitioners under Policy Decisions 20.08.2014 (Annexures P-3 and P-4, respectively more than 10 years of service along with all consequential benefits and arrears as petitioners are continuously working Department since the year 2005. Case of the petitioner covered with the recent judgment of this Court (Annexure P-6) passed by a co-ordinate Bench of this Court in a bunch of writ petitions having leading case CWP- Singh and others vs. State of Haryana and others Learned counsel for the petitioner , namely, Hemraj and Jagdish Labourer(s) on daily wages vide Appointment Letters dated (Annexures P-1 and P-2, respectively). Since then the petitioners are 3 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-28209-2026 Date of Decision: 02.09.2026 .… Petitioners .... Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDHI GUPTA Mr. SK Daaria, Advocate for the petitioners. etition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the petitioners for issuance of a the respondents to regularize the Policy Decisions dated 18.06.2014 and 4, respectively) and on completion of rvice along with all consequential benefits and ontinuously working in the respondent- . Case of the petitioners is squarely of this Court dated 12.05.2026 ordinate Bench of this Court in a bunch of -1770-2026, titled as ‘Deepak State of Haryana and others’. Learned counsel for the petitioners inter alia submits that the , namely, Hemraj and Jagdish were initially appointed as Appointment Letters dated 27.01.2005 2, respectively). Since then the petitioners are of the for issuance of a the respondents to regularize the and and on completion of rvice along with all consequential benefits and is squarely dated 12.05.2026 ordinate Bench of this Court in a bunch of Deepak the ere initially appointed as 27.01.2005 2, respectively). Since then the petitioners are RISHU KATARIA 2026.09.02 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgmdent. CWP-28209 working with the respondent the satisfaction of respondent years. As such, the petitioners are entitled for regularization of their service in terms P-3 and P-4 Apex Court in 3826. It is contended that the the Hon’ble Supreme Court in its recent judgment dated Madan Singh 2884394. The petitioner (Annexure 3. petitioners disposed of with a direction to the respondents claim of petitioner of law laid down by Singh cases’ (supra Singh’s case (supra) 4. 5. on behalf of respondent case, the aforesaid limited prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner accepted. It is also submitted by learned State counsel that t tenure of both 28209-2026 working with the respondent-Department regularly, continuously and to the satisfaction of respondent-Department till date i.e. for the past 21 years. As such, the petitioners are entitled for regularization of their service in terms of Policies dated 18.06.2014 and 4, respectively) as also in view of Apex Court in Jaggo vs. Union of India and others, 2024 SCC online SC It is contended that the policy dated Hon’ble Supreme Court in its recent judgment dated Madan Singh and others vs. State of Haryana: Law Finder Doc Id # The petitioners have also served a legal notice dated (Annexure P-5) in this regard upon the responden Learned counsel for the petitioner would be satisfied at this stage disposed of with a direction to the respondents claim of petitioners for regularization in a of law laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in Singh cases’ (supra) as well as judgment Singh’s case (supra). Notice of motion. Ms. Tanushree Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana on behalf of respondent-State and submits that she has the aforesaid limited prayer of learned counsel for the petitioner It is also submitted by learned State counsel that t both the petitioners needs to be ascertained as to whether 3 Department regularly, continuously and to Department till date i.e. for the past 21 years. As such, the petitioners are entitled for regularization of their .2014 and 20.08.2014 (Annexure as also in view of law laid down by the Hon’ble Jaggo vs. Union of India and others, 2024 SCC online SC policy dated 18.06.2014 has been upheld by Hon’ble Supreme Court in its recent judgment dated 16.04.2026 in and others vs. State of Haryana: Law Finder Doc Id # also served a legal notice dated 22.05.2026 upon the respondents. earned counsel for the petitioners submits that the if the present petition may be disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider and decide in a time bound manner, in view the Hon’ble Apex Court in Jaggo and Madan as well as judgment of this Court in Deepak Gupta, Addl. A.G., Haryana, accepts notice State and submits that she has ‘no objection’ in the aforesaid limited prayer of learned counsel for the petitioners is It is also submitted by learned State counsel that the service needs to be ascertained as to whether they Department regularly, continuously and to Department till date i.e. for the past 21 years. As such, the petitioners are entitled for regularization of their 20.08.2014 (Annexure the Hon’ble Jaggo vs. Union of India and others, 2024 SCC online SC been upheld by 16.04.2026 in and others vs. State of Haryana: Law Finder Doc Id # 22.05.2026 accepts notice in is he service they RISHU KATARIA 2026.09.02 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgmdent. CWP-28209 have rendered continuous and satisfactory service to make for regularization. 6. expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim raised by the petitioners direction to forthwith consider by passing a speaking and reasoned order, in accordance with law, within a period of of this order Hon’ble Apex as judgment of this Court in 7. 02.09.2026 rishu 28209-2026 rendered continuous and satisfactory service to make for regularization. After hearing learned counsel expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim raised by the in the present petition, the same is direction to the respondents/Competent Authority, concerned consider and decide the claim of petitioner by passing a speaking and reasoned order, in accordance with law, within a period of 06 months from the date of receipt of of this order, while keeping in mind the judgment Apex Court in Jaggo and Madan Singh as judgment of this Court in Deepak Singh’s case (supra) Pending application(s) if any also stand(s) disposed of. 02.09.2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable rendered continuous and satisfactory service to make them eligible After hearing learned counsel for the parties and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the claim raised by the the present petition, the same is disposed of with a the respondents/Competent Authority, concerned, to claim of petitioners for regularization by passing a speaking and reasoned order, in accordance with law, from the date of receipt of a certified copy , while keeping in mind the judgments passed by the Madan Singh cases’ (supra) as well Deepak Singh’s case (supra). Pending application(s) if any also stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No eligible RISHU KATARIA 2026.09.02 18:44 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgmdent.