Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2014 DAILYLAW 2004 (PNJ)

SURESH KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/25438/2026 · 2026-08-13

Nidhi Gupta

body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 139 Suresh Ku State of Ha CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU 1. Constitutio writ in the the service 18.6.2014 juniors/sim regularized 2. petitioners respondent following d Sr. No. CWP-25438-2026 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR CWP No.25438 o Date of decision sh Kumar and others Versus Haryana and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mrs. Jai Shree Kaushik, Advo for the petitioners. Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DAG HI GUPTA J. (Oral) Present writ petition und titution of India has been filed by the p in the nature of Mandamus directing th ervices of the petitioners in the light o .2014 (Annexure P-3) or from the rs/similar situated employees of th larized and also to grant all consequent It is inter alia submitted by ioners that the present seven petitione ndent Department on the posts of Ke wing dates :- Name Date Appointment 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH 5438 of 2026 (O & M) cision :-13.08.2026 …..Petitioners …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA Advocate , DAG, Haryana. under Article 226 of the y the petitioners for issuance of a ting the respondents to regularize light of the Policy decision dated the date the services of the of the petitioners have been equential benefits etc. ed by learned counsel for the titioners were appointed in the of Key Man/Beldar as per the of ment Designation VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.17 16.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 3. be regulariz 3), which h Singh and 2884394. to be cons Hon’ble Su SCC OnLin 4. 5. on behalf o 6. stage, the 17.6.2026 regularizati for petition CWP-25438-2026 (O & M) Suresh Kumar 04.5.2006 Mahipal 01.3.2007 Balwan Singh 01.5.2007 Gaje Singh 01.3.2009 Daya Ram 01.8.2011 Vinay Kumar 01.8.2012 Vinod Kumar 01.10.2013 It is submitted that the petitio gularized in the light of the Policy dat hich has been upheld upto the Hon’ble and others vs. State of Haryana It is further submitted that respo e considered for regularization in t ’ble Supreme Court in ‘Jaggo vs. U nLine SC 3826’. Notice of motion. Mr. Harish Kumar Nain, DAG ehalf of respondent-State. Learned counsel for the petit , the petitioners shall be satisfied i .2026 (Annexure P-5) considering th larization in terms of the Policy dated etitioners No.1 to 4; and for petition 2 Key Man/Beldar Key Man/Beldar Key Man/Beldar Key Man/Beldar Key Man/Beldar Key Man/Beldar Key Man/Beldar petitioners No.1 to 4 are liable to icy dated 18.6.2014 (Annexure P- on’ble Supreme Court in Madan yana: Law Finder Doc Id # t respondents No.5 to 7 are liable n in terms of the judgment of Union of India and others, , DAG, Haryana accepts notice e petitioners submits that at this sfied if the Legal Notice dated ing the claim of the petitioners dated 18.6.2014 (Annexure P-3) etitioners No.5 to 7 in terms of VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.17 16.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document ‘Jaggo vs. decided in 7. he ‘no obje 8. 9. the parties, direction to fresh cons regularizati within a pe Policy dat Hon’ble Su Singh’s (su in Deepak 10. August 13 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo CWP-25438-2026 (O & M) vs. Union of India and others, S ed in a time bound manner. Learned counsel for the respo o objection’ to the same. Heard. Accordingly, with the consen arties, present Civil Writ Petition sta tion to the State of Haryana/concern consideration to the claim of eac larization, as aforestated; and pass a s in a period of 08 months from today, y dated 18.6.2014 (Annexure P-3) ’ble Supreme Court in Jaggo’s case h’s (supra) as well as judgment of thi pak Singh’s case (supra). Pending application(s) if any a 3, 2026 r speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 3 , SCC OnLine SC 3826’ be e respondent-State submits that consent of learned counsel for ion stands disposed of, with a oncerned Department to accord each of the petitioners for ass a speaking order thereupon oday, while keeping in mind the 3); and the judgment of case (supra) and in Madan t of this Court dated 12.05.2026 f any also stand(s) disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.08.17 16.55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document