RAJ KUMAR v. HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS
CWP/15295/2014 · 2026-07-07
Aman Chaudhary
body2014
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 1962 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 1962 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 208
CWP-15295-2014 Date of Decision: 07.07.2026 RAJ KUMAR
... Petitioner VERSUS HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS ... Respondents
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY. **** Present: Mr. Rampal Kaushik, Advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Pardeep Rajput, Advocate for the respondents. **** AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL)
1.
Learned counsel for the respondents states that the cost stands deposited in compliance with the order dated 23.04.2026.
2.
Learned counsel is not able to dispute that the initial appointment of the petitioner was as a Water Pump Operator (Helper), which is Class-IV post and was accordingly regularized as Complaint Attendant, which is also a Class-IV post.
3.
As per instructions, there is no provision for regularization of a Class-IV employee against a Class-III post as sought by the petitioner, who is not able to substantiate, basis any rule, his entitlement for the claim as raised or demonstrate that he fulfilled the qualification required for a Class-III post. There is a speaking order dated 20.12.2013 (Annexure P-8) which has taken into account all aspects of the matter.
4.
Dismissed.
(AMAN CHAUDHARY) JULY 07, 2026.
JUDGE Rajender
Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No
Whether reportable
: Yes/No RAJENDER KUMAR 2026.07.07 16:09 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order