Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2014 DAILYLAW 1960 (PNJ)

GANPATI RICE MILL v. PUNJAB AGRO FOODGRAINS CORP LTD AND ANR

FAO/10516/2014 · 2026-07-06

Lapita Banerji

body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 211 M/S GANPATI RICE MILL PUNJAB AGRO FOODGRAINS CORP CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Present : None. LAPITA BANERJI, J. This is an old appeal of 2014. On several occasions, requests for adjournment have been made on behalf of the appellant. Vide an order dated February 10, 2026, the predecessor Bench noted that last opportunity was being granted to the learned counsel for t matter. Despite such observation, the appellant is yet again not represented today. Accordingly, the present appeal being FAO No.10516 of 2014 is dismissed for non JULY 06, 2026 Prince Whether speaking/reasoned : Whether reportable : IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-10516-2014 (O&M) DATE OF DECISION : 0 GANPATI RICE MILLS, MUDKI Versus PUNJAB AGRO FOODGRAINS CORPORATION HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI None. LAPITA BANERJI, J.(ORAL) This is an old appeal of 2014. On several occasions, requests for adjournment have been made on behalf of the appellant. Vide an order dated February 10, 2026, the predecessor Bench noted that last opportunity was being granted to the learned counsel for t matter. Despite such observation, the appellant is yet again not represented Accordingly, the present appeal being FAO No.10516 of 2014 for non-prosecution. , 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT 06.07.2026 …APPELLANT ORATION LTD AND ANR …RESPONDENTS HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI This is an old appeal of 2014. On several occasions, requests for adjournment have been made on behalf of the appellant. Vide an order dated February 10, 2026, the predecessor Bench noted that last opportunity was being granted to the learned counsel for the appellant to argue the matter. Despite such observation, the appellant is yet again not represented Accordingly, the present appeal being FAO No.10516 of 2014 (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE PRINCE SAINI 2026.07.06 18:16 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document