RSA-1555- IN THE HIG 225 Punjab State Kuldeep Sin CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. judgment of District Judg was allowed passed by consequentia 2. submits that whether juris the Electricit Bench of th Sub Division 3. and the suit ground of ju -2014 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o State Electricity Board Versus ep Singh M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. JS Randhawa, Advocate for None for the respondent. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The appellant-defendant is in ent of reversal dated 30.09.2013 pass t Judge, Moga whereby the appeal fil llowed, setting aside the judgment a by the learned trial Court; and uential relief of permanent injunction At the very outset, learned that the question of law involved er jurisdiction of the Civil Court is bar ectricity Act, 2003, has since been dec of this Court in RSA-4181-2016, ti ivisional Officer and Another’ vide j In view of the above, the prese e suit filed by the respondent-plain d of jurisdiction. However, the respon ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-1555-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 19.03.2026 .… Appellant(s) .... Respondent NIDHI GUPTA ate for the appellant(s). in second appeal against the passed by the learned Additional eal filed by the plaintiff/respondent ment and decree dated 18.09.2012 t; and suit for declaration with nction was allowed. rned counsel for the appellant(s) volved in the present appeal as to t is barred in view of Section 145 of en decided by the Hon’ble Division , titled as ‘Mahesh Kumar vs. vide judgment dated 14.05.2025. e present second appeal is allowed, plaintiff stands dismissed on the respondent-plaintiff is at liberty to the onal with s to 5 of sion vs. the y to RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.20 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-1555- take recour law. 4. made in the judicata in plaintiffs. 5. 6. Registered Sh. Harmohi 19.03.2026 rishu -2014 (O&M) -2- ecourse to the appropriate remedy as It is made clear that any ev in the impugned judgments and decr in any subsequent proceedings Pending application(s), if any, s Registry is directed to send a ered Post to respondent-plaintiff, n rmohinder Singh, at the address menti 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable dy as available, in accordance with ny evidence recorded/observations d decrees would not operate as res ings initiated by the respondent- any, shall stands disposed of. send a copy of this order through , namely, Kuldeep Singh S/o mentioned in the Memo of Parties. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No with ions es ugh S/o RISHU KATARIA 2026.03.20 16:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.