155 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH HUKAM CHAND AND ORS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. Mr. Aayush Bansal, Mr. Abhinav Kalia, DAG, Haryana. HARKESH MANUJA By way of present revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge has been 28.08.2014 passed by the preferred under Section 28 ‘the Act’) at the instance of petitioners 2. The grouse of the petitioner the amount awarded in favour of the petitioner released in terms of interim order dated 20. in Regular First Appeal(s) 3. Learned counsel for the respondent a subsequent order dated 07.01.2016 passed by this Court in the abovementioned pending RFAs, 50 entitlement of petitioner benefits stands released, however, the remaining 50% with learned Reference Court liberty to seek withdrawal IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: HUKAM CHAND AND ORS Versus STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Mr. Sanjiv Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Aayush Bansal, Advocate for the Mr. Abhinav Kalia, DAG, Haryana. **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge has been 28.08.2014 passed by the Land Acquisition Collector preferred under Section 28-A of the Land Acquisitio at the instance of petitioners-landowners. The grouse of the petitioners-landowner the amount awarded in favour of the petitioner released in terms of interim order dated 20.03.2014 passed by this Court First Appeal(s) arising out of the acquisition in hand. Learned counsel for the respondent a subsequent order dated 07.01.2016 passed by this Court in the abovementioned pending RFAs, 50% of enhancement amount qua entitlement of petitioners-landowners along with benefits stands released, however, the remaining 50% with learned Reference Court and the petitioner withdrawal thereof in accordance with law IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-6265-2023 (O&M) Date of Decision: May 06, 2026 .....Petitioners ........Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Sanjiv Gupta, Sr. Advocate with Advocate for the petitioners. Mr. Abhinav Kalia, DAG, Haryana. By way of present revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge has been laid to the order dated Land Acquisition Collector upon an application A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 ( for short landowners. landowners is that only 50% of the amount awarded in favour of the petitioners-landowners have been 03.2014 passed by this Court arising out of the acquisition in hand. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that in terms of a subsequent order dated 07.01.2016 passed by this Court in the % of enhancement amount qua along with statutory interest and benefits stands released, however, the remaining 50% stands deposited petitioners-landowners are at thereof in accordance with law. (O&M) May 06, 2026 By way of present revision petition filed under Article 227 of to the order dated upon an application n Act, 1894 ( for short that only 50% of have been 03.2014 passed by this Court submits that in terms of a subsequent order dated 07.01.2016 passed by this Court in the % of enhancement amount qua interest and deposited are at TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.05.11 16:50 I agree to specified portions of this document CR-6265-2023 (O&M) -2- 4. In view of the aforesaid development, no cause survives in the present petition and the same is thus dismissed. However, it is made clear that the petitioners-landowners shall also be entitled for the benefits of enhancement, if any, awarded by this Court in the pending RFA(s) pertaining to the acquisition in hand in terms of law laid by the Hon’ble Apex Court vide decision dated 13.01.2026 passed in Civil Appeal No(s).391 - 398 of 2026 (@SLP (C) No(S).4532-4539 of 2023), titled “Ramphal & Ors. Versus Haryana State Industrial And Infrastructure Development Corporation Limited & Ors. 5. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 06.05.2026 (HARKESH MANUJA) Tejwinder JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.05.11 16:50 I agree to specified portions of this document