Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2014 DAILYLAW 1906 (PNJ)

KAMLESH AND ORS v. RAJBIR AND ORS

FAO/2180/2014 · 2026-04-02

Nidhi Gupta

body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

FAO-2180 IN THE HIG 223 Kamlesh and Rajbir and o CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP 1. seek enhanc them vide i Motor Accid MACT Case Motor Vehi children and time of accid 2. the main app by the Prede of hearing i.e 3. appellants claimants ar 80-2014 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA FAO Date o sh and others Versus and others M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH Mr. JP Sharma, Advocate for th Mr. RC Gupta, Advocate for res I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) By way of filing the present ap nhancement of compensation amoun vide impugned Award dated 08.11.2 Accident Claims Tribunal, Narnual Case No. 76 dated 01.05.2013 file Vehicles Act, 1988. The 05 claim en and parents of deceased-Narender S f accident. The matter pertains to the year in appeal was issued only to responde Predecessor Bench, vide order dated ring i.e. 09.02.2017, none had appeare Today, at the very outset, learn s has submitted that despite his nts are not coming forward to purs ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH FAO-2180-2014 (O&M) Date of Decision: 02.04.2026 .… Appellants .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA for the appellants. for respondent No. 4-Insurance Co. sent appeal, the appellant-claimants amount of ₹6,24,800/- awarded to 08.11.2013, passed by the learned arnual, in a claim petition bearing filed under Section 166 of the claimants are the widow, minor nder Singh, who was 31 years old at e year 2014 and notice of motion in spondent No. 4-Insurance Company dated 05.02.2016. On the last date ppeared for the appellants. t, learned counsel appearing for the te his best efforts, the appellant- o pursue the present appeal. It is ants d to rned ring the inor ld at in any date e It is RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.06 13:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. FAO-2180 accordingly prosecution. 4. appellant wo pendency of 12 years, th attempt has new counsel 5. prosecution 6.  02.04.2026 rishu 80-2014 (O&M) -2- ingly prayed that the present app ution. In the aforesaid premise, issu would be a futile exercise. It ap ncy of the present appeal before this C ars, the appellants have lost interest t has been made by them to contact ounsel. Accordingly, the instant app cution. Pending application(s), if any, s 2026 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable t appeal be dismissed for non- issuance of fresh notices to the It appears that due to sheer long this Court for a period of more than terest in pursuing the same, as no ontact their counsel or to engage a t appeal is dismissed for non- any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No the long than s no ge a RISHU KATARIA 2026.04.06 13:48 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.