Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2014 DAILYLAW 1858 (PNJ)

M.L.M. TRUST AND ANR v. LUXMI NARAYAN AGGARWAL AND ORS

RSA/2272/2014 · 2026-03-16

Nidhi Gupta

body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN TH 224-II M.L.M. T Cantt. thro Luxmi Nar CORAM: Present:- NIDHI GU defendant a learned C plaintiffs/re No.1 conti been partly No.1/plaint infructuous seeking dec RSA-2272-2014 (O & M) IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJA AT CHANDIGAR Regular Second Appeal Date of decision :-16.03 .M. Trust Society and Managing tt. through its President Sh. A.N. Gu Versus i Narayan Aggarwal and others AM:- HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NI Mr. R.P. Daaria, Advocate for Mr. K.K. Garg, Advocate for the appellants. Mr. Gaurav Gupta, Advocate f Service upon respondents No.2 order dated 08.4.2016). HI GUPTA J. (Oral) The present second appeal dant against the concurrent judgments ed Courts below, whereby th tiffs/respondents seeking declaration t continues to be a life-time member partly decreed. At the very outset, learned /plaintiff submits that the present a ctuous inasmuch as by way of the ing declaration regarding life-time me 1 UNJAB AND HARYANA IGARH ppeal No.2272 of 2014 (O & M) .03.2026 aging Committee, Ferozepur N. Gupta and another …..Appellants …..Respondents E NIDHI GUPTA ate for ocate for respondent No.1. ts No.2 to 4 dispensed with (vide appeal has been filed by the gments and decrees passed by the y the suit filed by the ation to the effect that respondent ember of the appellant Trust has learned counsel for respondent sent appeal has been rendered f the suit the respondents were e membership of the plaintiff of VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.19 09.49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document the appella therefore, n of the state present ap infructuous having bee of. March 16 Vijay Asija Whether spea Whether Repo RSA-2272-2014 (O & M) ppellant Trust. However, respondent N fore, no cause of action survives any lo Learned counsel for the appe e statement made by learned counse nt appeal may be disposed of a ctuous. In view of the above, the prese g been rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any 6, 2026 speaking/reasoned Yes / No r Reportable Yes / No 2 dent No.1 has since expired and, s any longer. appellants submits that in view ounsel for respondent No.1, the of as having been rendered e present appeal is disposed of as if any, shall also stand disposed ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE VIJAY ASIJA 2026.03.19 09.49 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document