180 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND GRAM PANCHAYAT MAJRA DULI CHAND AND OTHERS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Ms. Bhoomika, HARKESH MANUJA By way of present revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge has been laid to order dated 27.08.2014 passed by the learned Additional District J Apparently, the present revision petition has been preferred at the instance of petitioner after a gap of almost 10 years without there being any explanation rendered for such delay and laches. Moreover, on the face of it, the short prayer apportionment of compensation, for which remedy lies somewhere else. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail his alternate remedy in accordance with law. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. 09.04.2026 Tejwinder IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: GRAM PANCHAYAT MAJRA Versus DULI CHAND AND OTHERS HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARKESH MANUJA Ms. Bhoomika, Advocate for the **** HARKESH MANUJA, J. (ORAL) By way of present revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge has been laid to order dated 27.08.2014 passed by the learned Additional District J Apparently, the present revision petition has been preferred at the instance of petitioner after a gap of almost 10 years without there being any explanation rendered for such delay and laches. Moreover, on of it, the short prayer made in the present petition is for apportionment of compensation, for which remedy lies somewhere else. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail his alternate remedy in with law. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CR-2599-2024 Date of Decision: April 09, 2026 ........Petitioner ......Respondents HARKESH MANUJA Advocate for the petitioner. By way of present revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge has been laid to order dated 27.08.2014 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Rewari. Apparently, the present revision petition has been preferred at the instance of petitioner after a gap of almost 10 years without there being any explanation rendered for such delay and laches. Moreover, on made in the present petition is for apportionment of compensation, for which remedy lies somewhere else. In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail his alternate remedy in Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. (HARKESH MANUJA) JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Yes/No 2024 April 09, 2026 Petitioner By way of present revision petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge has been laid to order dated Apparently, the present revision petition has been preferred at the instance of petitioner after a gap of almost 10 years without there being any explanation rendered for such delay and laches. Moreover, on made in the present petition is for In view of the aforesaid, the present petition is dismissed. However, the petitioner shall be at liberty to avail his alternate remedy in TEJWINDER SINGH 2026.04.10 18:53 I agree to specified portions of this document