FAO-5269-2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 203 FAO-5269-2014 Date of Decision: 17.04.2026 PALVI SHARMA AND OTHERS ......Appellants Vs. KAMAL SINGH AND OTHERS .....Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE SUDEEPTI SHARMA Present: None for the appellants. Mr. Pradeep Kumar, Advocate for respondent No.4 – Insurance Company. **** SUDEEPTI SHARMA J. (Oral) 1. On the last date of hearing, Registry was directed to issue notice to the appellants as well as their counsel. 2. As per report of Registry, learned counsel for the appellants has been informed through E-mail, whereas notices issued to the appellants have been received back with the report, “unserved as not traceable (Adampata)”. 3. In view of the same, this Court is left with no other option but to dismiss the present appeal for non-prosecution. 4. Dismissed for non-prosecution. 5. Liberty is, however, granted to the appellants to get the present appeal revived, if any cause of action survives. 6. All pending Misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. 17.04.2026 (SUDEEPTI SHARMA) P. Seth JUDGE Whether speaking/non-speaking : Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No POONAM RANI 2026.04.18 15:18 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document