APHC010040102014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE 28 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22326/2014 Between: 1. G. GANGADHARA RAO,, W/O MAHAMKALI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O MERLAPALEM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 2. KOPPISETTI VENKATESWARA RAO,, S/O MUSALAYYA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, NOWKARNAMA, R/O D.NO. 3 GUBBALAVARIPALEM, KOTHAPETA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, PROHIBITION & EXCISE DEPT. SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, PROHIBITION & EXCISE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. 3. P SRIDEVI, W/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, SUPERINTENDENT, PROHIBITION & EXCISE, AMALAPURAM DIVISION, EXCISE OFFICE, AMALAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. N V RAMANACHARYULU, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, INSPECTOR, PROHIBITION & EXCISE, KOTHAPETA CIRCLE, PROHIBITION & EXCISE OFFICE, W.P.No.22326 of 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE 28th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 22326/2014 G. GANGADHARA RAO,, W/O MAHAMKALI, AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS, R/O MERLAPALEM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. KOPPISETTI VENKATESWARA RAO,, S/O MUSALAYYA, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, NOWKARNAMA, R/O D.NO. 3-39, KANDRIGA H/O GUBBALAVARIPALEM, KOTHAPETA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI ...PETITIONER(S) AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PRINCIPAL HIBITION & EXCISE DEPT. SECRETARIAT, THE COMMISSIONER, PROHIBITION & EXCISE, GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, HYDERABAD. P SRIDEVI, W/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, SUPERINTENDENT, PROHIBITION & EXCISE, IVISION, EXCISE OFFICE, AMALAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. N V RAMANACHARYULU, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, INSPECTOR, PROHIBITION & EXCISE, KOTHAPETA CIRCLE, PROHIBITION & EXCISE OFFICE, RC,J W.P.No.22326 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3332] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI G. GANGADHARA RAO,, W/O MAHAMKALI, AGED ABOUT 38 KOPPISETTI VENKATESWARA RAO,, S/O MUSALAYYA, AGED 39, KANDRIGA H/O GUBBALAVARIPALEM, KOTHAPETA MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI ...PETITIONER(S) THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PRINCIPAL HIBITION & EXCISE DEPT. SECRETARIAT, THE COMMISSIONER, PROHIBITION & EXCISE, GOVERNMENT OF P SRIDEVI, W/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, SUPERINTENDENT, PROHIBITION & EXCISE, IVISION, EXCISE OFFICE, AMALAPURAM, EAST N V RAMANACHARYULU, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, INSPECTOR, PROHIBITION & EXCISE, KOTHAPETA CIRCLE, PROHIBITION & EXCISE OFFICE, RC,J W.P.No.22326 of 2014 2 KOTHAPETA, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction especially in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the inaction of the respondents Nos. 1 & 2 in initiating any action pursuant to the representation, dated 16-06-2014 against the respondents 3 and 4, as illegal, arbitrary and Art 14, 19 (1) (g) and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to initiate necessary action against the respondents 3 and 4 pursuant to the representation/complaint dated 16-06-2014 and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 28009 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents No. 1 and 2 to consider the representation dated 16- 06-2014, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. T V JAGGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PROHIBITION & EXCISE (AP) 2. T V JAGGI REDDY The Court made the following: RC,J W.P.No.22326 of 2014 3 ORDER Despite listing the mater under the caption “for dismissal”, there is no representation for petitioners. This indicates that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the mater. 2. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed for non prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________________________ JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI 28TH July, 2026. RR