Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2014 DAILYLAW 1686 (AP)

THOTA KASI VIJAY KUMAR & 3 OTHERS v. THE STATE OF A.P., & ANOTHER

CRLP/7947/2014 · 2026-06-28

K Suresh Reddy

body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Date of reserved for orders: Date of pronouncement : Date of uploading : APHC010491452014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 29 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7947/2014 Between: 1. THOTA KASI VIJAY KUMAR & 3 OTHERS, S/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 28 YRS, OCC: SOFTWARE ENGINEER, R/O D.NO.8 6/3 NEHRU NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THOTA VENKATAIAH,, S/O NAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YRS, R/O D.NO.8-5-101, 6/3 NEHRU NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THOTA SUBBAMMA,, W/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YRS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.8 GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 4. THOTA SRINIVASA RAO,, S/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YRS, R/O D.NO.8-5-101, 6/3 NEHRU NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 1. THE STATE OF A P COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD. 2. THOTA GOUTHAMI, W/O KASI D.NO.12-11-571, 2ND LANE, RAMIREDDYTHOTA, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 29.06.2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 29th DAY OF JUNE 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 7947/2014 THOTA KASI VIJAY KUMAR & 3 OTHERS, S/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 28 YRS, OCC: SOFTWARE ENGINEER, R/O D.NO.8 6/3 NEHRU NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. VENKATAIAH,, S/O NAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YRS, R/O 101, 6/3 NEHRU NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THOTA SUBBAMMA,, W/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YRS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O D.NO.8-5-101, 6/3 NEHRU NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. VASA RAO,, S/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YRS, 101, 6/3 NEHRU NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND THE STATE OF A P,, REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF A.P., HYDERABAD. THOTA GOUTHAMI, W/O KASI VIJAY KUMAR, AGED 24 YRS, R/O 571, 2ND LANE, RAMIREDDYTHOTA, GUNTUR, ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH [3239] THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SURESH REDDY THOTA KASI VIJAY KUMAR & 3 OTHERS, S/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 28 YRS, OCC: SOFTWARE ENGINEER, R/O D.NO.8-5-101, VENKATAIAH,, S/O NAGAIAH AGED ABOUT 60 YRS, R/O 101, 6/3 NEHRU NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT. THOTA SUBBAMMA,, W/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YRS, 101, 6/3 NEHRU NAGAR, VASA RAO,, S/O VENKATAIAH, AGED ABOUT 44 YRS, 101, 6/3 NEHRU NAGAR, GUNTUR, GUNTUR ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) , REP.BY ITS PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH VIJAY KUMAR, AGED 24 YRS, R/O 571, 2ND LANE, RAMIREDDYTHOTA, GUNTUR, ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT(S): 2 Petition under Section 437/438/439/482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court to quash the C.C.No.243 of 2014 on the file of IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, IA NO: 1 OF 2014(CRLPMP 7494 OF 2014 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay all further proceedings in C.C.No.243 of 2014 on the file of IV Addl. Junior Civil Judge, Guntur including appearance of the petitioners/Accused Nos.1 to 4, pending disposal of the criminal petition and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1. ATCHUTUNI RAMA MOHAN RAO Counsel for the Respondent/complainant(S): 1. K SRINIVAS 2. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following ORDER: No representation on either side. 2. It is brought to the notice of this Court by the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor that the main Calendar Case vide C.C.No.243 of 2014 was disposed of by the learned IV Additional Junior Civil Judge, Guntur, vide order dt. 15.10.2025,. 3. In view of the said submission, the cause in the present Criminal Petition does not survive for further adjudication. 3 Accordingly, this Criminal Petition is dismissed as infructuous. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending, if any, shall also stand closed. __________________ K.SURESH REDDY, J 29.06.2026 MVA Whether the order is: Speaking ☑ Reasoned Reportable Non-reportable ☑