Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2014 DAILYLAW 1682 (AP)

Sri A.R.VASUDEVA MURTHY, v. TT DEVASTANAMS,

WP/5119/2014 · 2026-06-22

B Krishna Mohan

body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010508152014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3233] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE B KRISHNA MOHAN WRIT PETITION NO: 5119/2014 Between: 1. SRI A.R.VASUDEVA MURTHY,, SON OF LATE A. RAMSHARMA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCC. : RETIRED EMPLOYEE, RESIDING AT NEW VALLABH VIDYANAGAR, ANAND, GUJARAT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. TT DEVASTANAMS, TIRUPATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH. REP. BY ITS EXECUTIVE OFFICER. 2. S V AYURVEDIC COLLEGE, TIRUPATHI, ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a direction, order or writ more particularly one in the nature of writ of Mandamus while exercising its inherent powers call for the records and declare that for computation and fixation of the Petitioner's pension taking the pay as on 26.03.2003 instead of 30.09.2008 is illegal, discriminatory and violative of his fundamental rights guaranteed under the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents to pay the differential amount with interest and pass appropriate orders and pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 6362 OF 2014 2 BKM,J W.P.No.5119 of 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to take up the matter for expeditious disposal and pass. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CH SRINIVASA RAJU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. ANUP KOUSHIK KARAVADI(SC FOR TIRUMALA TIRUPATHI DEVASTHANAMS) 3 BKM,J W.P.No.5119 of 2014 The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that no cause survives in this matter. 2. Recording the said submission, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. Interim order if any deemed to have been vacated. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Interlocutory Applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________ JUSTICE B. KRISHNA MOHAN 23.06.2026 PGT