K. SANYASI, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST. v. THE STATE OF A.P.,MUN.ADMN.,HYD.,& ANR.
WP/39426/2014 · 2026-06-15
Harinath N
Public Interest Litigationbody2014
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 1664 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 1664 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010774072014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 39426/2014 Between:
1. K. SANYASI, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST., R/O. D.NO. 55-6-39, AMBEDKAR COLONY, ISUKATHOTA, MADDILAPALEM, VISAKHAPATNAM DIST.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF A P MUN ADMN HYD ANR, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, SAIFABAD, HYDERABAD.
2. GREATER VISAKHAPATNAM MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, VISAKHAPATNAM REP. BY ITS COMMISSIONER
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order or direction more particularly one in the anture of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 2nd respondent in demolishing 2nd floor structures of the petitioner building bearing D.No. 55-6-39 situated in S.No. 30/2, Ambedkar Colony, Isukathota, Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam Town & District alone by leaving all other neighbouring G + 2 & G + 3 buildings constructed in
-2- HN, J W.P.No.39426_2014 an extent of 96, 60, 49 square yards without obtaining any permission, as illegal, arbitrary and discriminatory, and consequently direct the 2nd respondent not to interfere either with the petitioner aforesaid construction activity or possession and enjoyment of the aforesaid house.
IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 49449 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of demolition of the reamining structures (i.e., Slab & Pillars) in II floor of the petitioner building bearing D.No. 55-6-39 situated in S.No. 30/2, Ambedkar Colony, Isukathota, Maddilapalem, Visakhapatnam Town & District. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. G VENKATA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)
2. J DILEEP KUMAR
-3- HN, J W.P.No.39426_2014
ORDER:
1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner(s) submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for any further
consideration.
2. Recording the said submission, this Court is of the view that no adjudication on merits is required. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:16.06.2026 NKA
-4- HN, J W.P.No.39426_2014 15 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N
WRIT PETITION NO: 39426 of 2014 Date: 16.06.2026
NKA