Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2014 DAILYLAW 1663 (AP)

TAMMINENI PEDA RAMI REDDY AND 2 OTHERS v. THE STATE OF AP., REP BY ITS PRL.SECRETARY AND 3 OTHERS

WP/32765/2014 · 2026-06-15

Harinath N

body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HN, J W.P.No.32765_201 4 APHC010226582014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32765/2014 Between: 1. TAMMINENI PEDA RAMI REDDY AND 2 OTHERS, S/O.PEDA ALLURAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, OCC.BUSINESS, R/O.DOOR NO.8/28/55, 8TH WARD, KANIGIRI STREET, KANIGIRI VILLAGE & MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 2. SANGU SUBBA REDDY,, S/O. SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 27 YEARS, OCC. SERVICE, R/O.DOOR NO.8/28/57, 8TH WARD, KANIGIRI STREET, KANIGIRI VILLAGE & MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. SANGU RAVINDRA,, S/O. SUBBA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS, OCC. PRIVATE EMPLOYEE, R/O.DOOR NO.8/32, 8TH WARD, KANIGIRI STREET, KANIGIRI VILLAGE & MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF AP REP BY ITS PRL SECRETARY AND 3 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL CORPORATION & PANCHAYAT RAJDEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, HYDERABAD. 2. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KANDUKUR, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR KANIGIRI MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. HN, J W.P.No.32765_201 4 4. THE COMMISSIONER, NAGARA PANCHYATH, KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents in trying to demolish the structures in the houses of the Petitioners situated at 8th Ward, Door No.8/28-55, 8/28/57, 8/32, Y.S.R. Road, Kanigiri, Prakasam District, without issuing any prior notice, proper opportunity or proceedings as legal, arbitary, against principles of natural justice and contrary to Article 14, 19, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the properties without following due process of law and to pass such other order or orders as this Hong)le Court may deems tit just and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 40970 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents not to demolish the structures the houses of the Petitioners situated at 8th Ward, Door No.8/28-55, 8/28/57, 8/32, Y.S.R. Road, Kanigiri, Prakasam District, and to give proper opportuntiy to the accept the house plans submitted pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass such other order or orders as this Honble Court may deems fit Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VENKATESWARLU GADA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B D MAHESWARA REDDY 2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) HN, J W.P.No.32765_201 4 ORDER: 1. In view of the facts and circumstances of the case, and having regard to the interim orders passed by this Court on 31.10.2014, no further orders are required to be passed in the present writ petition. 2. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed off in terms of the interim orders passed. However, it is made clear that the respondent authorities are at liberty to take appropriate steps, if so required, by issuing fresh notices and proceeding in accordance with law. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:16.06.2026 NKA HN, J W.P.No.32765_201 4 14 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 32765 of 2014 Date: 16.06.2026 NKA