Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2014 DAILYLAW 1649 (AP)

T. Kondal Rao, v. The State of A.P.,

WP/27801/2014 · 2026-05-04

Harinath N

body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010811982014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] TUESDAY,THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 27801/2014 Between: 1. T. KONDAL RAO,, S/O. LAXMAIAH, AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC: INCHARGE, SRI PUSHPAGIRI MUTT, TIRUMALA, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOR DISTRICT. RIO. FLAT NO.101, NITYA PRASADAM APARTMENTS, K.T. ROAD, TIRUPATHI, CHITTOR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF ENDOWMENTS, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD - 500 022. 2. THE COMMISSIONER, ENDOWMENTS, HYDERABAD. 3. SRI SRI SRI PUSHPAGIRI JAGATGURU, SHANKARACHARYA MAHASANSHANAM, REPRESENTED BY ITS PETTADHIPATHI SRI VIDYA NRUSIMHA BHARATHI SWAMIJI, HAVING BRANCH OFFICE AT # 1/10/176/B, BEGUMPET, HYDERABAD. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, declaring the action of the 3rd Respondent, in issuing the termination order dated: 31-07-2014 (received on 08-08-2014) terminating the service of petitioner as Incharge of Sri Pushpagiri Mutt, Tirumala as illegal, arbitrary, untenable, contrary to the A. P. Charitable and 2 Hindu Religious Institution and Endowment Act 1987 and violative of Article 14, 16 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently set-aside the same and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble High Court may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WVMP 3278 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to vacate the interim order dt.18.9.2014 made in WPMP No.34809 of 2014 in WP No.27801 of 2014 until further orders IA NO: 2 OF 2014(WPMP 34809 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents, to continue the petitioner as incharge Sri Pushpagiri Mutt, Tirumala by suspending the operation of the termination order dated: 31-07-2014 issued by 3rd Respondent in the interest of justice and in the interest of the petitioner, pending disposal of the Writ Petition and pass such further or other orders as deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2016(WPMP 34902 OF 2016 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to permit the petitioner to file the Proceedings dt. 05.12.2015 and 04.03.2016 as additional material papers for obtaining necessary orders from this Hon'ble Court in W.P.No. 27801/2014, in the interest of justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. KAMLA SEELAM B Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ENDOWMENTS (AP) 2. G SUDHA The Court made the following: 3 ORDER:- There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent, appearing virtually online, submits that the order passed on 31.07.2014 was subsequently revoked and fresh orders was passed on 05.12.2015, as such, the cause in the writ petition does not survive for any further adjudication on merits. 3. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date.05.05.2026 SR