Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2014 DAILYLAW 1640 (AP)

Shaik Mahaboob Basha, v. The Kadapa Municipal Corporation,

WP/22894/2014 · 2026-04-06

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010103952014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] TUESDAY,THE SEVENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 22894/2014 Between: 1. SHAIK MAHABOOB BASHA,, S/O LATE S. GHOUSE MOHIUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, 2. SHAIK MOHAMMED RAFI,, S/O LATE S. GHOUSE MOHIUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, 3. SHAIK MYNUDDIN,, S/O LATE S. GHOUSE MOHIUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, 4. SHAIK NIZAM,, S/O LATE S. GHOUSE MOHIUDDIN, AGED ABOUT 31 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, ALL THE PETITIONERS ARE THE RESIDENTS OF D.NO. 18/354, DEVUNI KADAPA ROAD, KADAPA CITY, Y.S.R.DISTRICT ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE KADAPA MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, REP., BY ITS COMMISSIONER, KADAPA, Y.S.R.DISTRICT, 2. THE CITY PLANNER KADAPA MUNICIPAL, CORPORATION, KADAPA CITY, Y.S.R.DISTRICT. 3. THE INSPECTOR OF WAKF WAKF BOARD, KADAPA, Y.S.R DISTRICT. 4. THE ZULEQUA BEE MASJID ASSOCIATION, REP. BY ITS PRESIDENT S. AMEERUDDIN, S/O. ABDULLAH SAHAB, AGED 2 ABOUT 68 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O. 20-1198, R.K.NAGAR COLONY, KADAPA, Y.S.R.DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. V R REDDY KOVVURI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. MOHAMMED GAYASUDDIN 2. 3. GP MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV AP The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri D. Vigneshwara Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners and Sri M. Sohail Shareef, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri Mohammad Gayasuddin, learned Counsel for the Respondent No.3. 2. Sri D. Vigneshwara Reddy, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri V.R. Reddy Kovvuri, learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioners, on instructions, submits that this Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. No order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt:07.04.2026 Vns