APHC010497742014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 24107/2014 Between: 1. APPUNABOTHU LAKSHMANA RAO,, S/O LATE KARMA RAO, AGE: 42 YEARS, OCC: PETTY FLOWER VENDING SHOP RESIDING AT BALIJI STREET, VIZIANAGRARAM TOWN, VIZIANAGRARAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, VIZIANAGARAM MUNICIPALITY VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGRARAM DISTRICT. 2. RENT CONTROL AUTHORITY, VIZIANAGARAM MUNICIPALITY VIZIANAGARAM, VIZIANAGRARAM DISTRICT. 3. BUGATHA MUTYALU, SON OF BUGATHA APPANNA AGE: 48 YEARS, OCC: PRIVATE EMPLOYEE RESPONDENT NO. 3 R/O 36TH WARD, AVANAPU STREET, VIZIANAGARAM TOWN, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in making efforts to dispossess the petitioner from the Flowers Vending shop in shop No. 1/2, M.G. Road, Opp: Lane to Clock Tower, Vizianagaram town as illegal, arbitrary, violative of principles of natural justice, without any due process of law and also violative of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India consequently direct the respondents 1 and 2 to consider the representation of the petitioner dt: 24-07-2014. and pass such other order or orders as this Hon'ble Court may deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P L RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. 2. A JAGANNADHA RAO The Court made the following: The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Sri P. Lingeswara Rao, learned Counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 2. Having so recorded, the Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 08.04.2026 CVD