APHC010550632014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17728/2014 Between: 1. T.RAVI KUMAR, W.G.DIST, OCC: RECORD ASSISTANT RIO PENTAPADU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. GOVT OF AP EDUCATION DEPT 4 OTHERS, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY, EDUCATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERBAD 2. THE DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION SAIFABAD HYDERABAD, - 3. THE REGIONAL JOINT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL EDUCATION, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA 4. THE DISTRICT EDUCATIONAL OFFICER, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ELURU 5. THE SECRETARY AND CORRESPONDENT, S.T.V.N. HINDU HIGH SCHOOL PENTAPADU WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue writ of mandamus and any other appropriate writ order or orders direction declaring action of the respondent no 3 to 5 in not considering the petitioner as grant of Aid post of appointment of school assistant (Social 2 Studies) issued by the 5th Respondent vide Rc. No 19/2005-06 dated 01.05.2005 and not Ratifying the appointment of the petitioner in the 5th Respondent school as illegal arbitrary and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondent to absorb the petitioner as Grant-in-aid post in the 5th Respondent school and pass such other order or orders may deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 22203 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of appointment for filling up the vacant post in the 5th Respondent school till the rectification of the petitioner is made, pending disposal of the above writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P V S S S RAMA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR EDUCATION (AP) The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today none represented for the petitioner. On earlier occasion also, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 29.04.2026 PNS