APHC010467992014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] WEDNESDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 23766/2014 Between: 1. SRI CHITROJU JOGENDRA VENKATA RAMANA TATAJI,, S/O. SESHANARAYANACHARYULU, AGED 52 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, VANGAVARI STREET, JANGAREDDYGUDEM MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. THE ELECTION AUTHORITY, COMMISSIONER & DIRECTOR OF MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION, GOVT. OF AT., HYDERABAD. 3. THE NAGAR PANCHAYAT, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, REP.BY ITS CHAIR PERSON, JANGAREDDYGUDEM, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. 4. THE JANGAREDDYGUDEM NAGARPANCHAYAT, REP.BY ITS MUNICIPAL COMMISSIONER, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto pass orders particularly one in the nature of Writ of mandamus declaring the action of the 4th Respondent in rejecting the application of the petitioner by issuing Endorsement dt.12-08-2014 in Roc.No.196/2014-G1, dt.12-08-2014 as illegal, arbitrary and violative of Article 14 & 21 of the Constitution of India and against to the Principles of Natural Justice Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. S S.NAGESWARAREDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B D MAHESWARA REDDY 2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri P. Sai Harshith, learned Counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioner and Smt. Sireesha Rani Vallabhaneni, learned Standing Counsel for Respondent No.4. 2. Sri P. Sai Harshith, learned Counsel appearing for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 3. Having so recorded, the Writ Petition is disposed of as having become infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENIRAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Date: 08.04.2026 CVD