1 HN, J W.P.No.17914_2014 APHC010064262014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17914/2014 Between: 1. V.VENKAT RAMANA, S/O. LATE VENKATA RAO, AGED 48 YEARS,OCC: OSWI, R/O. ARAKU VALLEY (V) &( M), VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECERTARY, HOUSING DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, HYDERABAD. 2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, A.P.STATE HOUSING CORP. LTD., HIMAYAT NAGAR, HYDERABAD. 3. THE PROJECT DIRECTOR HOUSING, A.P.STATE HOUSING CORP. LTD., USHODAYA COMPLEX, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue order direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of MANDAMUS declare the proceedings of 1st Respondent in Lr.No.2652/R&UH.A2/2014/1, dated:12.06.2014 as illegal arbitary and violative of principles of Natural Justice and consequentially set aside the same IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 22458 OF 2014 2 HN, J W.P.No.17914_2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents to continue the petitioner as Out Sourcing Work Inspector under the control of Respondents pending disposal of the above writ petition IA NO: 4 OF 2014(WPMP 130135 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. P R K AMERANDRA KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. T SUDHAKAR REDDY 2. MALLIKHARJUNA MOORTHY K (SC FOR A.P HOUSING CORPORATION LIMITED) 3. M RAVINDRANATH REDDY(SC FOR APSHC) 4. GP FOR HOUSING (AP) 3 HN, J W.P.No.17914_2014 ORDER: 1. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the cause in the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication and that, in view of the same, the writ petition has become infructuous. 2. Having considered the submission made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this Court is of the considered opinion that the cause in the writ petition no longer survives for adjudication. 3. In view of the same, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. Pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date:09.04.2026 NKA 4 HN, J W.P.No.17914_2014 209 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17914 of 2014 Date: 09.04.2026 NKA