Smt G. Rajani Kumari v. Government of Andhra Pradesh
WP/23505/2014 · 2026-04-09
Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad
body2014
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 1600 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2014 DAILYLAW 1600 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010833762014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 23505 OF 2014 Between:
1. SMT G. RAJANI KUMARI, W/O. VENKATESWARLU, AGED 32 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O. PLOT NO.47, PRAGATHI COLONY, SOUTH BYE-PASS ROAD, ONGOLE. 2. SMT POLANI YASODA, W/O. GURUNADHAM, AGED 34 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O. PLOT NO.48, PRAGATHI COLONY, SOUTH BYE-PASS ROAD, ONGOLE. 3. KONETI LAKSHMI PRIYA, W/O. SRINIVASULU, AGED 27 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIFE, R/O. PLOT NO.82, PRAGATHI COLONY, SOUTH BYE-PASS ROAD, ROAD, ONGOLE. 4. G. RAMAKOTESWARA RAO, S/O. RAMAMURTHY, AGED 37 YEARS, OCC: HOUSE WIF;:!, R/O. PLOT NO.83, PRAGATHI COLONY, SOUTH BYE-PASS ROAD, ONGOLE. ...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MUNICIPAL ADMINISTRATION & URBAN DEVELOPMENT DEPT., SECRETARIAT, HYDERABAD. 2. ONGOLE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION ONGOLE REP BY ITS COMMISSIONER, -
3. TAHSILDAR ONGOLE REVENUE MANDAL ONGOLE, -
2
4. COLLECTOR DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT AT ONGOLE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a Writ/Order/Direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus by declaring the action of respondents more particularly, the action of the respondents 2 to 3 in high handedly interfering with peaceful possession and enjoyment of Plot Nos.47,48, 82 & 83 situated in Pragathi Colony, Ongole allotted to the petitioners vide D.K.No. 59/1418 dated 18.02.2009 is illegal, arbitrary, without notice and jurisdiction and in violation of Principle of Natural Justice and to pass. IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 29436 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents 2 to 3 not to interfere with petitioners peaceful possession and enjoyment over Plot Nos.47,48, 82 & 83 situated in Pragathi Colony, Ongole allotted to them vide D.K.No. 59/1418 dated 18.02.2009 pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass. Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. SRINIVASULU KURRA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE (AP)
2. GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP)
3
The Court made the following ORAL ORDER:
On 07.04.2026 none appeared for the Writ Petitioner.
Having noted the same, this Court had directed the Registry to list this matter today under the caption ‘For dismissal’. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioner. 2. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. 3. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. _________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 10.04.2026 Mnr
4
125
HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD
WRIT PETITION NO: 23505 OF 2014
Dt: 10.04.2026 Mnr