APHC010691522014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] WEDNESDAY,THE EIGHTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 3110/2014 Between: 1. ANANTHANENI VENKATESWARA RAO, S/O SESHAGIRI RAO, HINDU, ASST. MANAGER, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE CO LTD., RESIDENT OF ASHOK NAGAR, VIJAYAWADA, KRISHNA DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN-CUM-MANAGING DIRECTOR, 87, MG ROAD, FORT, MUMBAI-400 001 2. THE CENTRAL MANAGER APPELLATE AUTHORITY, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD., 87, MG ROAD, FORT, MUMBAI-400 001 3. THE DY GENERAL MANAGER DISCIPLINARY AUTHORITY, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LTD., 87, MG ROAD, FORT, MUMBAI-400 001 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Direction or Order, particularly in the nature of Certiorari calling for the records relating to the order of the first respondent dated 8.11.2013 confirming the order of the second respondent dated 12.2.2013, who has modified the order of the third respondent dated 17.7.2012 and quash the same and pass 2 IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 3810 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to suspend the impugned order of the first respondent dated 8.11.2013 confirming the order of the second respondent dated 12.2.2013, who has modified the order of the third respondent dated 17-7-2012 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V BHANU PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. POPURI LAKSHMI PRIYANVITA The Court made the following: 3 Order:- Despite the matter being listed under the caption for dismissal, today none represented for the petitioner. On earlier occasion also, there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 08.04.2026 PNS