Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2014 DAILYLAW 1590 (AP)

Neeli Appala Raju S/o Simhachalam, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/21411/2014 · 2026-04-08

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010260342014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY,THE NINTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 21411 OF 2014 Between: 1. Neeli Appala Raju S/o Simhachalam,, R/o. Peddagadili Village, Chinnagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam-40 2. Neeli Varalaxmi W/o Kanaka Raju,, R/o. Peddagadili Village, Chinnagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam-40 3. Molli Chandra Rao, S/o Devudu,, R/o. Peddagadili Village, Chinnagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam-40 4. Ch. Ramulamma W/o Appa Rao,, R/o. Peddagadili Village, Chinnagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam-40 5. Guntuboina Lakshmamma S/o Appala Swamy,, R/o. Peddagadili Village, Chinnagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam-40 6. Omni Appa Rao S/o Atchamma, R/o. Peddagadili Village, Chinnagadili Mandal, Visakhapatnam-40 ...Petitioners AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Principal Secretary to Municipal Administration, Secretariat, Hyderabad. 2. The Greater Visakhapatnam Municipal Corporation, Visakhapatnam, Rep. by Commissioner 3. The Special Officer GHMC, Visakhapatnam. ...Respondents 2 Counsel for the Petitioners: PAVITHRA MEDIKONDA Counsel for the Respondents: S LAKSHMINARAYANA REDDY(SC FOR GVMC) Counsel for the Respondents:GP-MUNCIPAL ADMN AND URBAN DEV(AP) 3 The Court made the following ORAL ORDER: Sri S. Vijaya Kumar, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of Sri A.S.C. Bose, learned Standing Counsel for Municipal Corporations is present. 2. On 02.04.2026, when this Writ Petition was called-out, there was no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioners. This Writ Petition is listed under the caption ‘For Dismissal’. Today also there is no representation on behalf of the Writ Petitioners. 3. Having so recorded, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non- prosecution. No Order as to Costs. 4. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 09.04.2026 JKS 4 40 HON'BLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION No. 21411 OF 2014 09.04.2026 JKS