Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010216032014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY SIX PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14119/2014 Between: 1.V.SATYANARAYANA RAO, S/O SREEMANNARAYANA MURTY, AGED 51 YEARS RHO H.NO. 4-20, MADHURANAGAR, NEAR LAKSHMI GANAPATHI TEMPLE, KAKINADA 533004 EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1.STATE BANK OF INDIA, LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, KOTHI, HYDERABAD 500195 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER APPELLATE AUTHORITY 2.STATE BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS REGIONAL BUSINESS OFFICER RAMARAOPET, KAKINADA 533004, E.G. DISTRICT 3.STATE BANK OF INDIA, REPRESENTED BY ITS GENERAL MANAGER (NW-III) AND APPOINTING AUTHORITY LOCAL HEAD OFFICE, KOTHI, HYDERABAD 5000195 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue an order direction or writ particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus or appropriate writ (i) declaring the Disciplinary Authority proceedings No. DPC/VJA/181 dated 26.4.2013 imposing the penalty of dismissal from service is illegal and arbitrary; (ii) declaring the order of the Appellate Authority dated 15.2.2014 communicated vide proceedings Letter No. (2-1)(F-28) dated 11.03.2014 is illegal and arbitrary; (iii) and consequently set aside the punishment of dismissal from service; (iv) and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2014(WPMP 17588 OF 2014 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to release the terminal benefits due to the petitioner by suspending the order of the Disciplinary Authority No. DPC/VJA/181 dated 26.4.2013 as confirmed by the Appellate Authority vide proceedings dated 15.2.2014 communicated vTe proceedings Letter No. (2-1)(F-28) dated 11.03.2014 and pass such further or other orders as the Hontle Court deems fit and proper in the circumstances of the case. Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.K UDAYA SRI
2 Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.S SATYANARAYANA MOORTHY 2.B S PRASAD The Court made the following:
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 14119 of 2014 ORDER: There was no representation for the petitioner on 09.04.2026. Today, when the matter was called there is no representation for the petitioner. Therefore, this Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
____________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N 16.04.2026 KGM
4 57 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION No.14119 of 2014 Dated 16.04.2026 KGM