- 1 - MSA No. 100109 of 2014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF MAY, 2023 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJENDRA BADAMIKAR MISCELLANEOUS SECOND APPEAL NO.100109/2014 (LA-) BETWEEN: BARAMAPPA S/O DEVAPPA PUJAR AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O. SHIRAHATTI VILLAGE, SHIRAHATTI TALUKA, GADAG DISTRICT. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. VINOD S PAWAR AND SRI. S V PAWAR ADV. FOR APPELLANTS-ABSENT; SRI. RAJASHEKHAR B HALLI.,ADVOCATE (NOC NOT OBTAINED)- ABSENT) AND: 1. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, (M I, DIVN), DHARWAD. 2. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, (LAO) GADAG. 3. THE SPECIAL DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, GADAG. …RESPONDENTS THIS MSA IS FILED U/SEC. 54(2) OF LA ACT, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT & DECREE DTD: 02.08.2014 PASSED IN LAC APPEAL NO.1/2013 ON THE FILE OF THE PRINCIPAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, GADAG, DISMISSING THE APPEAL FILED AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DTD: 27.09.2006 PASSED IN LAC NO.107/2002, ON THE FILE OF THE CIVIL JUDGE (SR.DN) AND CJM, GADAG, PARTLY ALLOWING THE PETITION FILED U/SEC.18 OF LA ACT. YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Digitally signed by YASHAVANT NARAYANKAR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD - 2 - MSA No. 100109 of 2014 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORDER The matter was called in the morning session. There was no representation for the appellant and hence, the matter was passed over. The office objections are not complied though sufficient opportunities were granted. Even during second call, there is no representation for the appellant. Hence, the appeal stands dismissed for non-compliance of office objections. Sd/- JUDGE YAN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 5