Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2014 DAILYLAW 1072 (GAU)

SRI TANKA DAHAL and 122 ORS, v. THE STATE OF ASSAM and 5 ORS,

WP(C)/6909/2014 · 2026-04-01

Anjan Moni Kalita

Writ Petition (Civil)body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010020192014 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6909/2014 SRI TANKA DAHAL and 122 ORS, S/O- LT. PREMLAL DAHAL, R/O VILL.- GADHARIYA BASTI. VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM and 5 ORS, REP. BY THE PRINCIPAL SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE DEPTT., DISPUR, GUWAHATI. Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. DEBEN SAIKIA, Advocate for the Respondent : ADDL. AG, ASSAM, GA, ASSAM,MR. R K BORAH,MR. Y DOLOI(R- 1-6),SC, FOREST,SC, REVENUE (R- 1) Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER 02.04.2026 None appears for the petitioners when the matter was called for. It is seen that on earlier occasions also, i.e. on 19.07.2021, 24.08.2021, 24.05.2022 and 06.06.2025, none appeared for the petitioners when the matter was called for. Office Note dated 13.06.2022 reveals that High Court’s order dated 24.05.2022 was sent to the petitioner nos.1 to 123, vide Memo No.HCXXII 1090/WP dated 10.06.2022 to Memo No.HC XII 1214/WP dated 10.06.2022. It is also seen from Office Note dated 23.05.2025 that except the communication made to petitioner no.38 which had been received back with postal endorsement “No such addressee Rtd to Sender”, no further communication or report received back by Registry from any of the petitioners. None has filed any fresh vakalatnama for any of the petitioners though they were earlier represented by a counsel. In view of the aforesaid, the case is dismissed for non-prosecution. JUDGE Comparing Assistant