Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2014 DAILYLAW 1067 (GAU)

SMTI SIPRA BHATTACHARJEE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS

WP(C)/6252/2014 · 2026-04-03

Soumitra Saikia

Writ Petition (Civil)body2014

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010128502014 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6252/2014 SMTI SIPRA BHATTACHARJEE W/O RANENDRA BHATTACHARJEE, NILMONI ROAD, BYE-LANE-1, P.O., P.S. and DIST. KARIMGANJ, ASSAM, PIN CODE 788710 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 9 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER and SECY. TO THE GOVT.OF ASSAM, HEALTH SERVICES FAMILY WELFARE DEPTT. DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE DEPUTY SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM HEALTH and FAMILY WELFARE DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES F.W. ASSAM SWASTHYA BHAWAN HENGABARI GUWAHATI-36 4:THE ADDL. DIRECTOR OF HEALTH SERVICES FW ASSAM SWASTHYA BHAWAN HENGRABARI GUWAHATI-36 5:THE JOINT DIRECTOR OF HELATH SERVICES KARIMGANJ and IN - CHARGE D.F.W.B. KARIMGANJ DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM. Page No.# 2/3 6:THE ADDL. CHIEF MEDICAL and HEALTH OFFICER KARIMGANJ DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM. 7:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL MEDICAL and HEALTH OFFICER F.W. I/C NILAMBAZAR P.H.C. NILAMBAZAR PIN 788722 DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM. 8:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL MEDICAL and HEALTH OFFICER I/C KACHUADAM P.H.C. P.O. SRIGOURI PIN-788806 DIST. KARIMGANJ ASSAM. 9:THE SECY. TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM FINANCE DEPTT. DISPUR GUWAHATI. 10:THE ACCOUNTANT GENERAL ASSAM MAIDAMGAON BELTOLA GUWAHATI-2 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR.R M CHOUDHURY, MR.R BARUAH Advocate for the Respondent : SC, FINANCE, SC, HEALTH,SC, AG Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 04.04. 2026 Mr. R. M. Choudhury, learned counsel appears for the petitioner; and also Ms. D. Bora, learned Standing Counsel appears for the Health, Ms. H. Sharma, learned counsel appears for the Accountant General. The learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that this writ petition has become infructuous as the grievance of the writ petitioner stood redressed, and accordingly the learned counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press the petition any further. The learned counsel for the petitioner has also placed before the Court a copy of the communication dated 04.11.2026, whereby the petitioner was intimated that the petitioner will superannuate on 31.01.2026. Accordingly, it is submitted that she had already superannuated on 31.01.2026. Taking into consideration, the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, this writ petition stands dismissed as infructuous. Interim order, if any, stands dismissed. Pending IAs are also dismissed. JUDGE Comparing Assistant