Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 5208 of 2014 Ghanashyam Barik, Sundargarh ..... Petitioner Mr. A. Nayak, Adv. On behalf of Mr. G. Mukherjee, Adv. -versus- Orissa S. Cooperative Bank, Rourkela ..... Opposite Party Mr. D. Udgata, Adv. On behalf of Mr. S. Udgata, Adv. CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 13.07.2026 Order No. 13 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the Opp. Parties. 3. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia with the following prayer:- “In the aforementioned facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner most humbly prays before this Hon'ble Court that this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to admit the present writ application, issue notice to the Opposite Party and upon hearing the parties may issue a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the Opposite Party Bank to refund the deducted amount of Rs. 6,63,371.00 with interest into the salary account of the petitioner being Account No. 2404 in the Rourkela Branch of the Opposite Party Bank and allowing the petitioner to operate his aforementioned account. Page 2 of 2. And any other writ / writs, order/orders, direction / directions that the petitioner may be found entitled to under law may be granted in his favour. And for this act of kindness the petitioner as in duty bound shall remain ever pray.” 4. However, taking into account the claim raised in the present Writ Petition, liberty is granted to the Petitioner to make a fresh representation before Opp. Party by enclosing all the relevant documents and citations in support of his claim, if any, within a period of three (3) weeks hence. 5. It is observed that if such representation is filed within the aforesaid time period, Opp. Party shall do well to take a lawful decision on the same within a period of three (3) months from the date of receipt of such representation. The order so passed by Opp. Party be communicated to the Petitioner. 6. With the aforesaid observation and direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Jyoti