Page 1 of 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 5199 of 2014 Surath Ch. Barik ..... Petitioner Mr. A. Behera, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. C.K. Pradhan, AGA Mr. A. Parida, Advocate (Opp. Party No. 2) CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 08.07.2026 Order No. 04 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard Mr. A. Behera, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner, Mr. C.K. Pradhan, learned Addl. Govt. Advocate appearing for the State-Opp. Parties and Mr. A. Parida, learned counsel appearing for Opp. Party No. 2. 3. It is fairly contended that during pendency of the writ petition, Petitioner got the benefit of regularization and in the meantime, he has also expired. 4. Considering the submission made, the writ petition stands disposed of as having become infructuous. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha