SARFARAZ ABDULLAH AWAN v. DIRECTOR GENERAL, CRPF, NEW DELHI
SWP/1385/2013 · 2026-09-03
Rajesh Sekhri
body2013
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 853 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 853 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No.26 Regular Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH
AT SRINAGAR SWP 1385/2013 SARFARAZ ABDULLAH AWAN …PETITIONER(S) Through: None. V/s.
DIRECTOR GENERAL, CRPF, NEW DELHI ...RESPONDENT(S) Through: Mr. T. M. Shamsi, DSGI with Mr. Faizan Ahmad Ganai, CGC.
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SEKHRI, JUDGE.
ORDER 03.09.2026
01. None appears for the petitioner today.
02. A perusal of the order sheets reveals that present case is being continuously adjourned on the request of the proxy counsels for one reason or the other.
03. It appears that petitioner is not interested in further prosecution of the case.
04. In view of the above, present petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
05. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated.
(RAJESH SEKHRI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR: 03.09.2026
“Hamid”
Abdul Hamid Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document