HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU OW104 No. 87/2013 c/w OW104 No. 32/2013 Munshi Singh and another …..Appellant(s)/Petitioner(s) Through: None Vs Swaran Singh .…. Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Rakesh Sadotra, Advocate Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 01.09.2026 OW104 No. 87/2013 1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on the last two dates of hearing, i.e. 22.07.2026 and 09.03.2026, and same is the position today as well. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the instant petition. 2. The instant petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. OW104 No. 32/2013 1. The record reveals that there was no representation on behalf of the petitioners on the last date of hearing, i.e. 29.04.2014, and same is the position today as well. Thus, an inference can be drawn that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the instant petition. 2. The instant petition is, accordingly, dismissed for non-prosecution. 3. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge Jammu 01.09.2026 Rahul Sharma Sr. No. 20