AIJAZ AHMAD BHAT v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (URBAN AND LOCAL BODIES) AND OTHERS
WP(C)/2013/2026 · 2026-08-18
Shahzad Azeem
body2013
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 850 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 850 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Serial No. 83 Supplementary-1 Cause List
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP (C) No. 2013/2026 CM No. 5455/2026
Aijaz Ahmad Bhat … Petitioner(s)
Through: - Mr Naveed Bukhtiyar, Advocate. V/s Union Territory of J&K and Ors. … Respondent(s)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE SHAHZAD AZEEM, JUDGE.
(ORDER) 18.08.2026
01.
Heard learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner.
02.
The Petitioner is seeking a direction to the Respondents for grant of second in-situ promotion from 2023 and to pay salary, accordingly, under thew Higher Pay Scale Rules, including arrears.
03.
The grievance of the Petitioner is that, despite he being due to second in-situ promotion, the Respondents are not granting him the same.
04.
Keeping in view the nature of relief sought for, coupled with
submissions made at the Bar, the instant Petition is taken up on Board for final hearing and is disposed of at this stage with a direction to the Respondents to consider the Writ Petition as representation on behalf of the Petitioner and accord consideration to the case of the Petitioner projected therein, in tune with the mandate of law/ Rules governing the subject. Let this exercise be completed by the Respondents expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this Order, along with Writ Petition and all its annexures.
05.
Writ Petition is, thus, disposed of on the above terms, along with the connected CM.
(SHAHZAD AZEEM)
JUDGE SRINAGAR August 18th, 2026
“TAHIR” Tahir Manzoor Bhat I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this document