HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case: SWP No. 923/2013 c/w SWP No. 928/2013 Rahul Razdan and Anr. ..... Petitioner(s)/Appellant(s) Through :- Mr. Rahul Aggarwal, Advocate Vs State of J&K and Ors. .....Respondent(s) Through :- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE ORDER 19.08.2026 SWP No. 923/2013 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the instant petition, with the efflux of time has been rendered infructuous and has instructions not to pursue the matter any further. His statement is taken on record. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. SWP No. 928/2013 Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the instant petition, with the efflux of time has been rendered infructuous and has instructions not to pursue the matter any further. His statement is taken on record. In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the petitioners, the instant petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. Interim direction, if any, shall stand vacated. (WASIM SADIQ NARGAL) JUDGE JAMMU 19.08.2026 Mihul Sr. No. 65