AMAR NATH BHARDWAJ AND ORS. v. MAHESHWAR SHARMA AND ANR.
MA/316/2013 · 2026-01-29
Wasim Sadiq Nargal
body2013
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 784 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 784 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 22
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
MA No. 316/2013
Amar Nath Bhardwaj and others
…. Petitioner/Appellant(s)
Through:- Mr. S.C. Mansotra, Advocate.
V/s
Maheshwar Sharma and another
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- None.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE WASIM SADIQ NARGAL, JUDGE
ORDER
29.01.2026
1. Mr. S.C. Mansotra, learned counsel for the appellants, submits that with the efflux of time, the present appeal has become infructuous. He further submits that all the appellants have expired and, therefore, the appeal also stands abated and states that he has instructions not to press the appeal any further.
2. In view of the statement made, the appeal is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous and as having abated.
3. Interim direction, if any, shall also stand vacated.
(Wasim Sadiq Nargal) Judge
Jammu:
29.01.2026 Michal Sharma/PS