HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU Case:- CPSW No.202/2013 in SWP No.259/2013 Murtiza Ahmed & Anr. …..Petitioner(s) Through: None. Vs Pandu Rang Pole, Dir Education & Anr. .….Respondent(s) Through: Mr. Raman Sharma, AAG with Ms. Saliqa Sheikh, Advocate Coram: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY DHAR, JUDGE ORDER (23.03.2026) 1. None for the petitioners. 2. Compliance report stands filed by the respondents. 3. As per the order of the writ Court, the respondents were directed to accord consideration to the representation of the petitioners for fixing their seniority with retrospective effect. 4. As per the compliance report, the respondents have accorded consideration to the representation of the petitioners and vide consideration order dated 31.01.2026 they have rejected the same on the ground that the petitioners cannot be accorded seniority from the date anterior to the date of their appointment. Serial No. 36 2 CPSW No.202/2013 in SWP No.259/2013 5. Once the respondents have considered the claim of the petitioners and passed the consideration order, the order of the writ Court stands complied with. If the petitioners have any grievance against the said order, they are at liberty to take appropriate legal course. 6. The contempt proceedings are closed and the petition is disposed of. (SANJAY DHAR) JUDGE JAMMU 23.03.2026 Sneha