Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2013 DAILYLAW 682 (ORI)

SACHIDANANDA MOHANTY v. M.D.,NESCO LTD.and OR

WP(C)/24650/2013 · 2026-09-09

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 1. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK WP(C) No. 24650 of 2013 CNR No. ODHC010033952013 Sachidananda Mohanty ..... Petitioner Mr. R.K. Panda, Advocate -versus- M.D., NESCO Ltd. & Ors. ..... Opposite Parties Mr. K.K. Rath, Advocate (Opp. Party No. 5) CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY ORDER 09.09.2026 Order No. 13 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner contended that he has received no instruction from his client. However, liberty be granted to revive the same by filing appropriate application within a period of four (4) weeks from today, if any cause of action still subsists. 4. With the aforesaid liberty, the writ petition stands dismissed on the ground of no instruction. (BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY) Judge Sneha