Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2013 DAILYLAW 601 (ORI)

ANUP KU.PATTANAYAK v. STATE and ORS.

WP(C)/15207/2013 · 2026-07-02

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.15208 of 2013 Subhendu Kumar Pattanayak …. Petitioner None -versus- State of Odisha & Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. P.K. Sahoo, ASC Mr. J. Mohanty, Adv. on behalf Ms. P. Rath, Sr. Adv. (O.P. NO.3) COROM: THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 02.07.2026 7. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. None appeared for the parties when the matter was called. 3. Considering the relief claimed and the fact that Petitioner in the meantime has already attained the superannuation, this Court is of the view that by efflux of time, the Writ Petition has become infructuous. 4. Accordingly the Writ Petition stands disposed of has having become infructuous. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge sangita