IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK RPFAM No.73 of 2013 Bidyutprava Patra …. Petitioner Mr. B. Sahoo, Advocate -versus- Samir Ranjan Parida …. Opp. Party None CORAM: JUSTICE MRUGANKA SEKHAR SAHOO Order No. ORDER 04.05.2026 (Hybrid Mode) 12. 1. The matter was presented before this Court on 11.09.2013. Notices were issued on 23.09.2013. Thereafter after appearance of the opposite party, the matter has not proceeded any further as it could not be heard for the last 3 years. Today, the matter is listed under the heading ‘For Admission’. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner-wife is before this Court challenging the order dated 01.08.2013 by the learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack in rejecting the prayer of the wife seeking maintenance U/s.125 Cr.P.C. It is submitted that despite effort to contact the petitioner remain incommunicado. The present marital status of the petitioner or the opposite party is not known to the learned counsel. 3. None appears for the opposite party when the matter is called. Opposite party is also absent on repeated calls. 4. The learned counsel for the petitioner files memo of date, which states thus: “That the counsel for the petitioner not received any instruction from my client hence I prayed before this Hon’ble Court to dispose of the matter as no instruction.” 5. Accordingly, the petition is disposed of. Copy of this order shall be forwarded to the court of learned Judge, Family Court, Cuttack to be kept in records of Criminal Proceeding No.641 of 2010 disposed of on 01.08.2013. (Mruganka Sekhar Sahoo) Judge Radha