Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2013 DAILYLAW 538 (ORI)

PUSPITA NANDA v. HDFC BANK LTD.

WP(C)/10195/2013 · 2026-01-06

S K Panigrahi

Writ Petition (Civil)body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page 1 of 2. IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.10195 of 2013 Puspita Nanda ..... Petitioner(s) Mr. Subash Ch. Acharya, Advocate -versus- HDFC Bank Ltd. & Anr. ..... Opposite Party(s) Mr. Nalini Kanta Dash, Adv. CORAM: THE HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SANJEEB K PANIGRAHI Order No. ORDER 06.01.2026 13. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid arrangement. 2. The Petitioner, by filing this Writ Petition, has made a prayer to set aside the letter dated 07.03.2013 vide Annexure-3. 3. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 4. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the Petitioner and on going through the averments made in this Writ Petition, without going into the merits of the case, this Writ Petition stands disposed of directing the Petitioner to approach the Opposite Party No.2/General Manager, Retail Claims, HDFC ERGO, General Insurance Company by way of filing an application within a period of two weeks hence. In such event, Opposite Party No.2/General Manager, Retail Digitally Signed Signed by: GITANJALI NAYAK Reason: Authentication Location: OHC Date: 08-Jan-2026 17:54:03 Signature Not Verified Page 2 of 2. Claims, HDFC ERGO, General Insurance Company shall consider his application within a period of 15 days in accordance with law from the date of presentation of the application along with a certified copy of this order, by the Petitioner. 5. It is further directed that till a decision to be taken by the Opposite Party No.2 on the application to be filed by the Petitioner, no coercive action shall be taken against the Petitioner. 6. The Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly. (Dr. Sanjeeb K Panigrahi) Judge Gitanjali