Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2013 DAILYLAW 524 (ORI)

LATA PRUSTY v. GM,EASTCOAST RLY.

WP(C)/29151/2013 · 2026-01-08

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.29151 of 2013 Lata Prusty & Ors. …. Petitioners Mr. H.B. Dash, Advocate -versus- GM, East Coast Railway …. Opp. Party Mr. B.S. Rayaguru, Sr. Panel Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 11.02.2026 I.A. No.2756 of 2026 10. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the Parties. 3. This I.A has been filed seeking extension of time to make the representation in terms of the order dtd.08.01.2026. 4. It is contended that because of illness of the father- in-law of Petitioner No.1, the representation in terms of the order dtd.08.01.2026 could not be made within the stipulated time period. 5. It is however contented that such a representation will now be made by 25.02.2026. p. 2 p. 2 6. Considering the submission, the prayer for extension of time is allowed. Petitioner is permitted to make a representation in terms of the order dtd.08.01.2026 on or before 25.02.2026. Rest part of the order shall remain unaltered. However, it is observed that no further extension will be allowed. 7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Subrat