IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.3142 of 2013 Arati Dash …. Petitioner Mr. G.R. Mohapatra, Adv. -versus- State of Odisha & Ors. …. Opposite Parties Mr. S.P. Das, ASC COROM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No ORDER 19.02.2026 07. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel for Petitioner and learned counsel for the State-Opposite Parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “The petitioners therefore most respectfully pray that Your Lordships be graciously pleased to issue rule Nisi as why suitable issuing writ/writs. order/order/ direction/directions should not be issued directing to pay a compensation of Rs 20,00,000/- to the petitioner; And if the opposite parties fail to show cause or show insufficient cause to make the said rule absolute. And/or to pass such other appropriate writ/writs, order / orders, direction / directions as this Hon'ble Court deems just, equitable and proper in the facts and circumstances of the present case.” 4. In course of hearing, learned counsel for the Petitioner state that highlighting his grievances, the Petitioner has made a representation to Opposite Party No.3 vide Annexure-6 and the same may be directed to be considered within a stipulated time, to which learned Counsel for the State has no objection. 5. As agreed by learned counsel for the parties and after going through the records, this Court, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, disposes of the Writ Petition directing Opposite Party No.3 to consider the representation filed by the petitioner vide Annexure-6 in accordance with law within a period of three (3) months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. Accordingly, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Jyoti