Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2013 DAILYLAW 4352 (MAD)

S.UMA MAHESWARAN(DIED) v. V.SHANMUGHAM

SA/1114/2013 · 2026-07-14

P Dhanabal

Transfer Petitionbody2013

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

S.A.Nos.1114 & 1115 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 14.07.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.DHANABAL S.A.Nos.1114 & 1115 of 2013 and M.P. Nos.1 & 1 of 2013 SA No.1114 of 2013 1. S.Uma Maheswaran (Died) 2.U.Gomathi 3.U.Abirami 4.U.Vidhya ... Appellants (Appellants 2 to 4 brought on record as LRs of the deceased first appellant viz. S.Uma Maheswaran vide Court order dated 24.11.2021 made in CMP Nos.7553, 7557 & 7558 of 2021 in SA No.1114 of 2013 and CMP No.7551 of 2021 in SA No.1115 of 2013) Vs. 1.V.Shanmugham 2.S.Pushparaj 3.V.Loganathan 4.T.L.Nachimuthu 5.M.Palanichamy 6.Amirthavalli 7.Manickkam 8.P.V.Raju 9.B.Sundararajan ... Respondents https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.Nos.1114 & 1115 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2013 SA No.1115 of 2013 1. S.Uma Maheswaran (Died) 2.U.Vidhya 3.U.Abirami 4.U.Gomathi ... Appellants (A4 brought on record as LRs of the deceased first appellant viz. S.Uma Maheswaran vide Court order dated 24.11.2021 made in CMP Nos.7553, 7557 & 7558 of 2021 in SA No.1114 of 2013 and CMP No.7551 of 2021 in SA No.1115 of 2013) Vs. Amirthavalli ... Respondent PRAYER in SA No.1114 of 2013 : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC, 1908 against the decree and judgment dated 15.11.2012 passed in A.S. No.5 of 2010, on the file of the II Additional District Court, Erode, reversing the decree and judgment dated 28.08.2009 passed in O.S. No.23 of 2002, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Erode. PRAYER in SA No.1115 of 2013 : Second Appeal filed under Section 100 CPC, 1908 against the decree and judgment dated 15.11.2012 passed in A.S. No.6 of 2010, on the file of the II Additional District Court, Erode, reversing the decree and judgment dated 28.08.2009 passed in O.S. No.304 of 2004, on the file of the Principal Subordinate Court, Erode. In SA No.1114 of 2013 : For Appellant : No appearance For R1 & R2 : Mr.S.Kaithamalai Kumaran For R9 : Mr.Ramaraj for Mr.M.Guruprasad https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.Nos.1114 & 1115 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2013 For R5, R3 & R4 : No appearance R6 & R8 : Not ready in notice In SA No.1115 of 2013 : For Appellant : No appearance For Respondent : No appearance COMMON JUDGMENT Already, learned counsel appearing for the appellants filed a Memo stating that no instruction for the appellants. Today, the matter is listed under the caption ‘for dismissal’, however there is no representation for the appellants. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents 1, 2 & 9 in SA No.1114 of 2013 are present. 2. In view of the same, the Second Appeals are dismissed for non prosecution. No costs. Consequently, connected Miscellaneous Petitions are closed. 14.07.2026 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No Speaking/Non-Speaking order mtl https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.Nos.1114 & 1115 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2013 To 1. The II Additional District Court, Erode. 2. The Principal Subordinate Court, Erode. 3. The Section Officer, VR Section, High Court, Madras. Page 4 of 5 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis S.A.Nos.1114 & 1115 of 2013 and M.P.Nos.1 & 1 of 2013 P.DHANABAL, J. mtl S.A.Nos.1114 & 1115 of 2013 and M.P. Nos.1 & 1 of 2013 14.07.2026 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis