(DELETED) Smt. Geeta Devi (DIED) THROUGH LRS. v. Arun Kumar Mal
WP227/865/2013 · 2026-09-14
Shri Sachin Singh Rajput
body2013
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 376 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 376 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WP227 No. 865 of 2013 1 - (Deleted) Smt. Geeta Devi (Died) Through Lrs. Through Power Of Attorney Holder Anil Kumar Mundra S/o Gopal Das Mundra, Aged About 44 Years, R/o Sadar Bazar Ward Bhatapara, Tahsil Bhatapara, District Baloda Bazar-Bhatapara (C.G.) As Per Honble Court
Order
Dated
08-04-2024. 1.1 - (A) Girdhar Das Mundra S/o Vasudev Das Mundra Aged About 72 Years R/o Sadar Bazaar,
Bhatapara,
District
Balodabazaar-Bhatapara
(C.G.) 1.2 - (B) Vinod Kumar Mundra S/o Dwarika Das Mundra Aged About 62 Years R/o Sadar Bazaar,
Bhatapara,
District
Balodabazaar-Bhatapara
(C.G.) 1.3 - (C) Anil Kumar Mundra S/o Late Shri Gopal Das Mundra Aged About 50 Years R/o Sadar
Bazaar,
Bhatapara,
District
Balodabazaar-Bhatapara
(C.G.) 1.4 - (D) Sunil Kumar Mundra S/o Late Gopal Das Mundra Aged About 44 Years R/o Sadar Bazaar, Bhatapara, District Balodabazaar-Bhatapara (C.G.)
... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - Arun Kumar Mal S/o Late Shri Meethalal Mal Aged About 48 Years R/o Purana Ganj Ward Bhatapara, Tahsil Bhatapara, District Balodabazar Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara,
Chhattisgarh 2 - Ajay Kumar Mal S/o Late Shri Meethalal Mal Aged About 58 Years R/o Purana Ganj Digitally signed by GOPAL SINGH Date: 2025.10.17 18:25:52 +0530
2 Ward Bhatapara, Tahsil Bhatapara District Balodabazar Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh, District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
... Respondent(s) For Petitioners : None For Respondents : Shri Raj Kumar Gupta, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Order on Board 17/10/2025
1. Yesterday, this matter was called for hearing twice, but, no one appeared for the petitioners nor any representation was made on their behalf. The matter was directed to be called for hearing today.
2. Today also, no representation is made on behalf of the petitioners.
3. In view of the circumstance, the writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/-
(Sachin Singh Rajput)
JUDGE Gopal