Amar Singh v. SMT. SHIVKANTIBAI (DIED) THOUGH LEGAL HEIRS
FA/96/2013 · 2026-08-13
Shri Sachin Singh Rajput
body2013
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 374 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2013 DAILYLAW 374 (CHH) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
CGHC010153452013
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR FA No. 96 of 2013 1 - Amar Singh S/o Shiv Singh Parihar Aged About 68 Years R/o Patharra, P.O. Marka, Tah. Kawardha, Distt. Kabirdham C.G., Chhattisgarh
... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Smt. Shivkantibai (Died) Though Legal Heirs W/o As Per Hon’ble Court Order Date- 19-03-2019. 1.1 - (A) Mahraj Singh Thakur S/o Hem Singh Thakur Aged About 67 Years R/o Kali Mai Ward, Mungeli, P.S. Tahsil And District- Mungeli, Chhattisgarh 2 - Devideen S/o Jagatdhari Aged About 51 Years R/o Jagtakapa, Near Village Chandergarhi, P.O. Bhatgaon, Tah. Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli C.G. 3 - Ramlal S/o Jagatdhari Aged About 48 Years R/o Jagtakapa, Near Village Chandergarhi, P.O. Bhatgaon, Tah. Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli C.G. 4 - Rajmani Singh @ Rajman Singh S/o Manik Singh Aged About 56 Years R/o C.M. Complex, Mungeli, Post, P.S. And Tah. Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli C.G. 5 - Jara Singh S/o Hem Singh Aged About 60 Years R/o Uslapur Near Village Pauni, Post- Tenradhoura, P.S. And Tah. Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli C.G. 6 - Ramlochan Singh S/o Hem Singh Aged About 58 Years R/o Uslapur Near Village Pauni, Post- Tenradhoura, P.S. And Tah. Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli C.G. DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Digitally signed by DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Date: 2026.08.17 15:29:55 +0530
2 7 - State Of Chhattisgarh Thru- Collector, Mungeli, Distt. Mungeli C.G.
... Respondent(s) For Appellant (s) : Shri Vipin Singh, Advocate For Respondents 1, 5, and 6 : Shri Kanhaiyya Yadav, Advocate For State : Shri Anand Gupta, Dy.G.A.
S.B.- Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput
Order on Board 14/08/2026
Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the dispute has been amicably settled amongst litigating parties and they have also filed application under Order 23 Rule 1 and 3 of CPC. As the parties are residing in remote village, therefore, they could not come before this Court. However, on instructions, an application under Order 23 Rule 1 CPC for withdrawal of this appeal has been filed as the dispute has already come to an end between the parties.
2. Shri Kanhaiya does not object to withdrawal of this appeal.
3. Heard on I.A.No.10, application for withdrawal of the appeal.
4. Upon consideration, the same is allowed.
5. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
6. All pending applications are also disposed off. Sd/-
(Sachin Singh Rajput)
JUDGE Deepti