1 CGHC010143032013 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR SA No. 17 of 2013 1 - Lohra S/o Late Gohandul Aged About 58 Years Village/post And P.S. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Tah. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Distt. Sarguja C.G. 2 - Mohra S/o Late Gohandul Aged About 53 Years Village/post And P.S. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Tah. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Distt. Sarguja C.G. 3 - Sohra S/o Late Gohandul Aged About 51 Years Village/post And P.S. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Tah. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Distt. Sarguja C.G. ... Appellant(s) versus 1 - Ram Tahal S/o Moti Aged About 53 Years Village/post And P.S. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Tah. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Distt. Sarguja C.G. 2- Dineshwar S/o Moti Dead, Chhattisgarh 3 - Smt. Rukhmani W/o Late Moti Aged About 68 Years Village/post And P.S. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Tah. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Distt. Sarguja C.G. 4 - Shrikant S/o Moti Aged About 50 Years Village/post And P.S. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Tah. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Distt. Sarguja C.G. 5 - Rameshwar S/o Moti Aged About 48 Years Village/post And P.S. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Tah. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Distt. Sarguja C.G., 2 6 - Masatram S/o Sukhram Aged About 68 Years Village/post And P.S. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Tah. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Distt. Sarguja C.G. 7 - Gaurinarayan S/o Motiya Aged About 53 Years Village/post And P.S. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Tah. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Distt. Sarguja C.G. 8 - Ramsneh S/o Gaurinarayan Aged About 28 Years Village/post And P.S. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Tah. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Distt. Sarguja C.G. 9 - Ramsubhag S/o Gaurinarayan Aged About 28 Years Village/post And P.S. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Tah. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Distt. Sarguja C.G. 10 - Rameshwar Agrawal S/o Surajbhan Aged About 63 Years Village/post And P.S. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Tah. Lakhanpur Jhinpuripara, Distt. Sarguja C.G. 11 - State Of Chhattisgarh Thru- The District Collector, Sarguja C.G. ... Respondent(s) For Appellant (s) : None For Respondents 7 to 10 : Ms. Seema Verma, Advocate on behalf of Shri Sanjay Patel, Advocate For Respondent / State : Shri Jaiprakash Tiwari, Advocate ({Hon’ble Shri Justice Sachin Singh Rajput}) Order on Board 14/07/2026 Despite two calls, none appeared for the appellant. Therefore, this Court is left with no option but to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. 2. The appeal is accordingly dismissed for want of prosecution. Sd/- ({Sachin Singh Rajput}) JUDGE Deepti DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Digitally signed by DEEPTI HARIKUMAR Date: 2026.07.15 10:54:03 +0530